Someone once said that the more things change, the more they remain
the same. The changes that have occurred in Indonesia since the resignation
of President Suharto have indeed been profound. As the U.S. ambassador-designate
to Indonesia, Mr. Robert S. Gelbard, noted in his recent U.S. Senate confirmation
testimony, “If Indonesia overcomes the immediate-term challenges of getting
a government viewed as legitimate and providing for a credible consultation
process in East Timor, it will have made one of the most stunning political
transformations of any nation this decade.”
The world press pushed
Indonesia to the forefront of the news last year with pictures of bloody
rioting and uprisings; this year they are showing pictures of a mostly
peaceful electoral process. Many of our home offices were greatly concerned
by the first and comforted by the second. So, if everything proceeds smoothly
with the presidential appointment, then we all have a new, clean government
leading a nation with transparent business practices-or so many home office
theories go.
When the recent Bank Bali scandal came to the public's attention,
I heard a visiting businessman comment, “I thought they had cleared that
kind of thing up.”
Not yet. The old powers may be trying to recoup their losses and damages
to the detriment of the new, young economy that is emerging. The method
by which the Bank Bali parties tried to recoup losses is traditional in
nature. The use of third-party intermediaries to secure a goal that you
could not yourself realize is a tried and true method of conflict resolution
in Asia generally and Indonesia specifically.
The major changes in economic transparency involve the reporting on
cases of corruption and abuse of power and not the instances of such corruption.
The calls for Reformasi and identifying KKN are growing. However, it appears
that Indonesian society is only requiring that the top businessmen and
government leaders be held responsible for their actions (or at least
be embarrassed by them).
I recently heard the phrase Transparency Through Gossip used to describe
the current calls for accountability. This tongue-in-cheek name for a
serious theory involves the emerging business and political forces' move
into positions that will enable them to take advantage of the new patronage
situations that will arise after the next MPR/Presidential appointment
scheduled for November. Because that outcome is not yet foreseeable, most
accusations that can be made to the detriment of one's opponents, will
be.
Fortunately, this allows for access to information on KKN that might
otherwise never rise to the surface. Unfortunately, once a new government
is established and a new administration is in place, there is a strong
possibility that public accusations of KKN will diminish as the cut of
the pie is spread around.
However, the main point that I wish to make in this column is that
the day-to-day business culture that existed under Suharto's New Order
government, that being the method of securing contracts, licenses and
permits for the majority of small and medium business, remains basically
the same today.
The middle and certainly lower level populations are still involved
(or entrapped) in the Kerjasama approach that has existed in Indonesia
for hundreds of years.
Kerjasama describes the idea of Korupsi (as in KKN) at the middle
and lower levels of society. While the West may translate Korupsi as Corruption
and as such be seen in a very negative light, many people in Indonesia
see Kerjasama as Cooperation, and the spreading of wealth that it involves,
as a normal part of the trading day.
Securing a commercial building permit in a residentially zoned area,
or paying “insurance” to make sure that your Warung Kopi continues to
exist on the sidewalk of a major shopping plaza are examples of Kerja
Sama.
In the work place, this may involve non-budgetary income to hiring
and purchasing managers, suppliers and distributors, or accounting and
financial staff. This is not a new idea. The same necessity to monitor
Tempat Basah (Wet Places) in the financial transactions of your company
is as great now as it has ever been.
Actually, it may have become more important. The financial crisis
and the perhaps poor, short-term prospects for promotion of employees
have damaged working relationships in many international offices in Indonesia.
As in all of my columns, reliable international business operations
relate to the presence or absence of solid work relationships between
expatriate managers and their Indonesian counterparts. Generally, if no
relationship exists, then there is no employment obligation to uphold,
period. To complicate things more, in Indonesia, office relationships
can break down without the expatriate managers understanding the outward
cultural signals.
As power shifts freely in these times of change, the obligation to
protect your community, especially the office community, becomes difficult
to define. “Will I have a job that will be here next year?” “If not, what
should I do?” These are two questions that many Indonesian employees are
asking themselves.
My conclusion as to the effect that all of this may have on your business
operations is cautionary in nature. Do not expect that the deep seated
influence of Kerjasama has disappeared with the reformation process. The
calls for justice and transparency are aimed at the political elite-not
necessarily your company. Your managers and supervisors may be willing
to compromise the integrity of the employer-employee relationship by accepting
non-budgetary income from other employees, suppliers, or distributors.
This has not yet changed and most probably will not change for years to
come-thereby repeating the mistakes of the past for another generation.
This article was generously contributed by George B. Whitfield, III when he was a Technical Advisor with Executive
Orientation Services. |