“Welcome Australian Soldiers! We have graves prepared for you.”
was a statement recently written on a placard carried by demonstrators
in Jakarta. Anti-Western sentiment is at a high point in the wake of the
referendum in East Timor. Foreign pressure on international financial
and aid institutions has added to the Indonesian nationalist groundswell
that appeared following the June 1999 parliamentary elections.
Indonesian-Western diplomatic relations have been disrupted to a great
extent; the work relationships between Westerners and Indonesian in many
international offices also are being affected.
It only takes a small incident, which then builds into a major issue,
to jeopardize the entire position of an international business in Indonesia.
There are emotional issues involved; independence, national unity, human
rights, democratization, and transparency are issues that people feel
strongly about.
Cross-cultural understanding is a learning process. Both the expatriates
and the Indonesian nationals should have an interest in each other's views.
However, informative discussion can quickly deteriorate into emotional
criticism. Understanding this, the main question here is how to maintain
effective working relationships in your company considering these emotional
and volatile issues.
There are several possible resolution strategies to this question.
Senior management needs to understand and analyze what kind of working
relationships have existed in the office up to now to decide which of
strategies to pursue.
First of these works in offices where the mixed nationality top management
has worked together for, say, five to ten years and are so well known
to each other that they would consider themselves 'friends', regardless
of any lack of social interaction. These offices often have no problems
discussing such issues. However, it seems that even in this case such
discussions are best held one-to-one to avoid the outward display of emotionalism
or confrontation in front of subordinate employees.
Second is large offices where the expatriate managers have been in
place for 'some time' and the work relationships and work acquaintances
seem fine. Here there are usually two approaches.
One of these is prohibiting political discussions completely. To let
it be known that this is an international-quality workplace and emotional
differences of opinion will not be tolerated.
This approach can be effective; however, it tends to broaden the gap
between Indonesian and Western employees because it does not increase
mutual understanding.
The cornerstone of the Third Corporate Culture that international
companies must develop in Indonesia is an ever increasing understanding
of the other culture's expectations and priorities. Any condition, rule,
or regulation that prevents an increase in that understanding must be
considered harmful. This is regardless of any short term apparent benefits
to the harmony of the office.
Another more productive solution is to recognize that such emotional
issues exist in your work staff and to try to work through and address
them in a controlled manner.
This can be done through written policy statements or, better, a general
meeting that clearly states that you understand that these issues exist,
that you already have good working relationships, and that you will take
every measure possible to get through these temporary 'bad' times and
work toward building a better future for all of your employees. It may
seem to be boilerplate, but this needs to be communicated clearly and
often.
The third and most volatile situation is where an international office
has recently had a large influx of expatriate personnel who have limited
international experience. The Oil/Gas, Financial and Banking sectors are
good examples of this. All of these sectors are employing expatriates
on short-term contracts to address immediate needs. These expatriates
usually do not have the experience to understand that 1) a difference
in views between themselves and their Indonesian hosts is natural, and
2) when and where it is appropriate to express those views.
Westerners often have very definite beliefs in the 'proper' values
that nations should possess. Dictatorship, genocide, and repression are
terms anathema to the values of most Westerners in Indonesia. They are
to most Indonesians also. However, the perception of events is different
to differing cultures. East Timor may be seen as an occupied territory
to many Westerners, however, it is the 27th province of Indonesia to most
Indonesians. Culture is environmental in nature coming partially from
the way one was taught to view things. Two different cultures can easily
look at the same situation and interpret it in vastly differing manners.
The volatility of this last situation stems from the tendency of Westerners
to voice their heartfelt beliefs in 'what is right' and with the Indonesians
growing tendency to express their own beliefs. These can easily come in
conflict with one another.
Western tempers rise quickly; Indonesian tempers rise just as quickly
but are often more controlled. To the expatriate, an argument may be a
passing thing, like a friendly debate perhaps. However, to an Indonesian
employee, a heated argument usually has long lasting negative effects
on the work relationship.
Further, most Westerners have an educational background that includes
rhetoric and debate. This background in formulating logical and rational
arguments often allows expatriates to dominate heated discussions with
Indonesians. The public education system here does not yet allow for such
studies. Of course, the Javanese and Priyayi mentality in most Indonesian
managers discourages these kinds of western-style debates in any case.
Upper management's goal should be to convince their Indonesian and
expatriate personnel that the working relationships that have been cultivated
are stronger than any passing nationalistic or racial rhetoric. That the
work force may indeed have strong differences of opinion, but that they
are a family. A family with ties stronger than any temporary disruptive
sentiment running through domestic and international circles.
This article was generously contributed by George B. Whitfield, III when he was a Technical Advisor with Executive
Orientation Services.
|